|
The Trouble with Maps
As well as Messrs Baxter and Burton and the Reverend Kelham, two major land owners in the area were Lord Fortescue and the Toller family. A 1759 map of “Lands called Neslam” “ Being the Estate of Revd Mr Toller show his lands contiguous with those of Lord Fortescue, Boaz Baxter, Thomas and Martin Burton. Boaz Baxter was the son of John Baxter and it seems that Thomas and Martin were Joseph Burton’s sons. The Reverend Mr Kelham’s land is not shown, as it “falls off the map”. What the map does show are two 8-Pipe Duck Decoys on the Toller land and although there is no sign of a Windmill, at the Eastern extremity of the land there is a field called Mill Yard. However, the siting of Mill Yard field does not line up with the description in the Agreement. A later map purporting to show the owners of the lands in 1766 shows the owners as before, but as it covers a far greater area, includes the land of Robert Kelham. The map moves the two Duck Decoys onto the lands of Thomas and Martin Burton and also shows two more, one apiece for Boaz Baxter and Robert Kelham. It also shows a windmill on the drove which is now the Neslam Road. It shows it to be some 6 chains (132 yards) further Westward, putting it on Lord Fortescue’s land. In his 1886 book on Duck Decoys, Sir Ralph Payne Gallwey mentions four Duck Decoys and naming one as the Millyard Farm Decoy. The 1904 Edition of the Ordnance Survey large scale map shows no sign of a windmill, but does show the outline of two fields which look like the remains of two of the Duck Decoys. Coming up to date, the OS Explorer 2 ½ inch to the mile still does not show a windmill, but does show a building on the possible site from the 1766 map. It also shows a bridge over the Billingborough Lode, at what seems to be the right place.
What did the Mill look like? We don’t have much to go on, other than its wooden construction seems to rule out a Tower Mill as these, in the main, used brick, or stonework in their construction. That leaves either a Post Mill, or a Smock Mill. The figure on the 1766 map is very small, but does look like a Smock Mill. Post Mills were not overly popular for English Drainage Mills, so my best bet is a Smock Mill set on a brick foundation one foot high. The main structure was, perhaps Oak, but the outside and roof, or cap covered in boards laid horizontally. The material for the boards is given as “good red harted slit fir Dale” . Dale, or as it is more commonly called, Deal comes in three sorts, White , Yellow and Red. The Red comes from the Scots Fir, or Pine. When looking at most people’s idea of a windmill the individual arms are attached to a central boss, called the Poll End, or Canister. The really heavy beams at the base of the arms are called the Stocks and the somewhat lighter but obvious main beam of the sail, used to connect the Sail to the Stock is called the Whip. Lincolnshire Mills, in the main, used a different technique whereby the canister is replaced by mitred joints and the whole is fitted to a cross on the end of the Windshaft. The shaft, or combined stock and whip, is called a Back. As the Fantail Rotor was not invented until 1745, the structure, body, or cap would have been turned into the wind by pushing the Tailpole attached to the rear of the Mill. Again it is uncertain whether the Water Wheel with its Scoops was fitted inside the Mill, or on the outside. I’d go for an external Wheel, but there would have to be sufficient clearance such that the Sails did not interfere with the Water Wheel and vice versa. The main Drain was Ten foot wide and Five foot deep, which means the Water Wheel, if its central shaft was fitted at about the height of the brickwork, would have been about Eleven feet in diameter, as a minimum. The Seven and a half inch wide scoops would have lifted the water to a higher level, although it is not clear where the Clow door, or Sluice gate was to be sited. It was obviously closely linked to the bridge, or tunnel and was meant to stop water from the Billingborough South Load from running back and flooding the fields.
|