For information on materials, see the section on Male
Clothing.
Colours would generally by muted pastel tones:
Bright colours, particularly deep blues, reds and purples were difficult to manufacture and maintain, and so their general use would be restricted to the nobility. Lower social ranks with some wealth would have probably restricted their use to trims and ornamentation. Two colours were particularly difficult (and hence expensive) to produce and maintain - pure black and pure white.
The jury is still out on this one. For obvious reasons, there are practically no period illustrations of womens underwear. We have seen references to positive evidence that underwear was not worn, but have yet to confirm this. Possibly no underwear was worn, possibly something similar to men's braies, or a simple breach cloth. In the abscence of firm evidence, there are two intuitive counter arguements:
Given the above issues with underwear, there are also unanswered questions relating to the wearing of hose. The Maciejowsi Bible (Paris, 1250) clearly shows women both wearing and not wearing hose (while ankles are not normally visible, hose can be seen though cutouts in shoes). Hose are either plain coloured, or have contrasting horizontal stripes. There are therefore the following possibilities:
A loose fitting "T-shaped" ankle-length garment of lighter weight linen. The sleeves would be tapered to the wrist, and would often reach over the hand to the base of the thumb. The dress would be full to allow movement, or would have had gores (traingular inserts) at the sides. The neck would be relatively tight.
The basic dress of the lower classes varied little across our period. Similar in basic construction to a mans' tunic but reaching down to below the ankles (ankles, like hair, were kept covered for reasons of modesty!). Gores would have been used to allow mobility. The neck would have been fairly tight and closed with a pin or broach, but may have allowed the underdress to show. The basic dress would have been unfitted, given shape only by a belt or waist tie.
The general trend for early Norman nobility was for plain designs of rich fabric, relatively simply decorated. During the 12th century various fashions emerged for the nobility and the wealthy - more fitting body outlines, coupled with fuller skirts and longer sleeves (often to the ground, and tied to prevent trailing). Affluence was flaunted by using excessive amounts of material. These carried well into the 13th century - though the later trend was for more simplistic lines.
Some specific fashions of the period include:
A rectangle of material with a neck hole, reaching at least to the waist, with no sleeves. Gives an effect rather like an apron or small poncho when held by the belt.
Belts would generally be thinmer than men's (10-15mm) in natural leather, or a strip of tablet weave or similar would been used.
Women's shoes follow the same general patterns as men's. Until at least the 17th century, there was no difference in manufacture between "left" and "right" shoes. However, experience has shown that period turnshoes will tend to mould to the shape of the foot, giving a visble difference between the left and right foot.
The same as men's clothing. Hoods were also worn.
All women of marrying age (twelve!) or over would have covered their hair. A woman's hair was equated with her virtue, and was not displayed in public. The veil or headrail was rectangular or oval. One edge hung over the forehead, concealing the hair; the rest falling in draperies around the face and neck, and often crossed over the front, thus encircling the face.
Two distinct styles of wearing the wimple appear to have been used in the period we portray:
©Mark Graves 2002